Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trochilic engine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  jj137  ♠ 19:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Trochilic engine
No independent, reliable sources. No books, no articles in technical or scientific journals. --Pjacobi (talk) 12:23, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete per nom. I tagged it unreferenced in September and left it in case someone was going to fix it but it hasn't improved. --Athol Mullen (talk) 12:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I'd like to point out that this article is very confusing and appears to have copyright issues, although I can't put my finger on where exactly it plagiarized from. ― LADY GALAXY 15:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The concept is by no means original, but, at the moment, it's just another non-notable invention that is _very_ unlikely to achieve commercial success.  When it does, the article can be re-created.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tevildo (talk • contribs) 20:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.