Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trojan.Zonebac


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:58, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Trojan.Zonebac

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable computer virus. Fails WP:GNG. See also: Articles for deletion/Adware.W32.ExpDwnldr as precedent. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in independent references. Incidental mentions in antivirus listings are not sufficient to establish notability, and a search turned up no other significant WP:RS coverage. Dialectric (talk) 02:03, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  13:03, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: Wikipedia is not a indiscriminate collection of information. Esquivalience t 14:40, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: While WP:INDISCRIMINATE properly concerns the structure of information and not whether we can have an article on a given topic, there is no evidence of notability in form of multiple reliable sources here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:58, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.