Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troon, Arizona


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is consensus to keep the material. Under which name is a matter for editorial discussion Star   Mississippi  02:15, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Troon, Arizona

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Large but non-notable development. Mangoe (talk) 03:33, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:44, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - easily passes WP:GNG, with literally thousands of articles about the location and the golf club. The golf club has ties to the historic Royal Troon Golf Club in Scotland. See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and this.  Searching is a bit onerous due to the large number of ads for the development, as well as the coverage of the Scotland location, but this is a very small sampling of what is out there. Onel 5969  TT me 02:00, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Move to Troon Country Club, which seems to be the notable topic in the sources above, not the housing development (which shouldn't have a title as if it were a town anyway – the generic neigborhood is among many in incorporated Scottsdale, Arizona). Reywas92Talk 15:30, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Move to Troon Country Club per Reywas. –dlthewave ☎ 15:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I tentatively agree with Move to Troon Country Club. I can't currently follow the links that @Onel5969 posted, but assuming they are sufficient for the GNG, that should be sufficient; or alternatively the place could be notable if local media consistently use it as a point of reference in articles about other topics. DavidLeeLambert (talk) 20:31, 16 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep - I have a feeling this PROD is based on dissatisfaction with the area's name (how it matches a slur). But this is definitely notable. Nweil (talk) 22:53, 16 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.