Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troop 26


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.-- May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 ($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 14:21, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Troop 26
Abduncan4 20:13, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * delete If Troop 34 does not deserve a wikipedia article according to wikipedia members because of various valid reasons, such as non-notable, scout troop vanity, and irrelevant, This policy should be instrumented across wikipedia.
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 15:46, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete despite nomination sounding like spite. Individual scout troops are nn. --Pboyd04 16:20, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per Pboyd04 --Petros471 17:06, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Troop 34 precedent. Also consider for expanded speedy A7, as the article makes no attempt to assert the importance of the subject. (We're 200 American Scouts is not a claim to importance in my book). Saberwyn - The Zoids  Expansion Project 23:20, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Individual scout troops are not notable enough to warrant Wikipedia articles of their own. --Metropolitan90 01:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into article about local council. Even at the local council level, that is inviting 250-300 articles about Scouting in the BSA alone. Districts and troops should really be subordinate sections of such articles. Chris 05:46, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per existing arguments. -Rebelguys2 01:25, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * If the information on the article's discussion page was expanded (national sigficance of troop), would the article have merit? --Soonercary 02:02, 2 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.