Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tropical Storm Bopha (2006)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 2006 Pacific typhoon season. Salvio giuliano 13:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Bopha (2006)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Tropical Storm Bopha (2006)

This storm is not sufficiently notable to justify a stand-alone article. It was submitted to Articles for Creation in November 2022, and the reviewer said to discuss at the parent article talk page, Talk:2006 Pacific typhoon season. It was then resubmitted by an unregistered editor (122.*) without discussion. It was then rejected due to the lack of discussion. The 122.* editor then copy-pasted the content of the draft to Tropical Storm Bopha (2006), which had previously been a redirect to the season article, and redirected the draft to the new storm article. The weather notability guide states:. This article, to the extent that it is intelligible, does not describe a significant impact on land. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Philippines,  and Taiwan. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect as nominator to 2006 Pacific typhoon season, and lock the redirect if necessary. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep not Redirects 122.52.66.207 (talk) 08:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. Chlod (say hi!) 09:16, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom to 2006 Pacific typhoon season, as to guide readers to the correct section. CycloneYoris talk! 09:32, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @CycloneYoris has correct section of bopha ok 122.52.66.207 (talk) 10:34, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect pre nom. The draft for this article was created by an IP on 25 March and at no point has it been intelligible English nor properly referenced. The IP addresses keep changing, but same person, most recently 122.52.66.207, has been persistent. The storm is competently described at 2006 Pacific typhoon season. David notMD (talk) 11:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: Copy-paste from draft, an improper move. Restore the redirect and restore the draft. UtherSRG (talk) 11:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. 122.52.66.207 (talk) 12:34, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 2006 Pacific typhoon season. The prose at the proposed redirect is understandable, while the standalone article is very poorly written. David10244 (talk) 07:41, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom.  Hansen Sebastian Talk 17:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep or Not Redirect add ref ok vote a Keep 122.2.115.1 (talk) 02:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect Poor English and not notable. I stopped editing this when it was still my version of the draft because it wasn't a notable subject. Songda    Talas  02:56, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * @SongdaTalas edit the draft Bopha 112.209.16.229 (talk) 04:03, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * How am I supposed to know what 'first storm with the PAGASA means'? Besides, there were no damages, and I can't change it because then it would be inaccurate. Songda    Talas  12:18, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep --112.209.26.43 (talk) 02:34, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment Please Keep my draft is done 112.209.26.43 (talk) 02:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect? Usually, if a storm caused enough damage to properties and loss of life in the Philippines, then that's what would make me argue in favor of a keep (like in the case of Typhoon Haiyan). But this one barely registered any damage or death for it to deserve its own article. --- Tito Pao (talk) 07:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * [Revised] Weak support for redirect or delete. Delete as per WP:NWEATHER statement above. Yet noncompliance to the same statement is also insufficient to make this article a redirect, having this can make further confusion as there's an article on a tropical cyclone with the same international name that caused much significant impact six years later. In this article, i found no any significant point(s), aside from poor editing.—Raider000 (talk) 19:47, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Additional comment. It's better for the article creator (or even for everyone) to make edits on the parent article (2006 Pacific typhoon season) rather than on this one, given the aforementioned criteria for making such.—Raider000 (talk) 23:58, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 2006 Pacific typhoon season. Per reasons above by other participants. Infinity (talk - contributions) 22:40, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep --112.209.28.10 (talk) 02:38, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Keep it 119.94.58.16 (talk) 02:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 2006 Pacific typhoon season: per nom. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 04:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep --112.209.16.229 (talk) 02:02, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep --119.94.37.168 (talk) 02:20, 7 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.