Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tropical Towerwars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete  Marasmusine (talk) 11:00, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Tropical Towerwars

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a tower defense map for Warcraft III that is a contested prod. I found one in-depth mention of it in media from a brief search, but that was it. I however cannot be certain of the reliability, and especially, it is not a source of the highest quality (something like Gamasutra for the gaming industry). I am therefore listing this for the primary reason of its lack of notability. --Izno (talk) 19:32, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

One source? I'm sorry, simply google "Tropical Towerwars" and you can find all sorts of external sources and references, ranging from Softpedia, EpicWar, Garena (a reputable gaming community site), wc3edit, boredAussie, gameserver, warcraft.org, mapgnome, all of which are relevant and refer to the in question TTW. Google for something slightly different like "Tropical Tower Wars" and again you find very similar search results, including highly reputable gaming community sites such as gamerzplanet, DotaStrategy, w3hacked, and more. I could go on. Google "TTW" and again relevant results high up in googles search results, such as war3.co.za, and so on (all of which where I'm not duplicating by listing cross similarities).

The official site has over 400 active members in the forum (a subsection of the website), of which many have expressed their willingness to buff out the wikipedia article, by properly referencing/citing all these sites mentioned above that have posted reviews on it, etc. The only reason I havent done this all myself already, is due to the 'conflict of interest' wikipedia rules, as well as (FYI): Official TTW site spam-blacklist issues TeBBuTT85 (talk) 12:14, 2 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Nomination was incomplete, late listed on 4 May. Cenarium (talk) 00:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MuZemike 17:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete this is  an excellent example. that there is some game content   too trivial for Wikipedia, DGG (talk) 00:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:RS as lacking real-world context from reliable secondary sources. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 17:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of verifiability. MuZemike 17:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of notability Eevee dk (talk) 19:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.