Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trostre AFC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:18, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Trostre AFC

 * — (View AfD)

This article was originally Prod'ed by myself, but the originating editor removed the tag without explanation (although he did put a message on my talk page asking me to help him improve the article). Another editor then re-prod'ed the article and the originating editor again removed the tag. I am therefore bringing the debate to AfD. My original reason for Prod'ing the article was that I feel that, given the general quality of football in Wales, a village team that plays in one of the amateur county leagues (four levels below the League of Wales) is not notable ChrisTheDude 21:03, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 21:03, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator ChrisTheDude 21:03, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Google found one entry, excluding Wikipedia pages. Anthony Appleyard 21:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Last year, Trostre Sports (who appear to be the club in question), won the Carmarthenshire League but did not chose to apply for promotion to the Welsh League Division Three. They lead the league again this year (WestWalesSport.com) They currently play at Level 5 in Wales, which from the limited personal experience of games at that standard is on average much lower than the Level 10 in England that we use as our guideline, so Delete. Besides that, the article is an unintelligble mess - fchd 21:34, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per fchd. 00:01, 28 December 2006 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwghlm (talk • contribs)
 * Delete per fchd. – Elisson • T • C • 16:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.