Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trouble On a Plane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Trouble On a Plane

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM.  ttonyb (talk) 07:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I cna't find significant coverage for this film. Joe Chill (talk) 00:23, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: this article has plenty of valid references to IMDB pages, official websites, online articles and interviews. MrDirector (talk) 03:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment – the references fail to provide "non-trivial" coverage of the film and fail to meet the criteria in WP:RS.  ttonyb (talk) 06:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete for lack of sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:31, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per previous users, refs on page are trivial and do not meet WP:RS. Movie does not have significant or verifiable sources. avs5221 (talk) 02:47, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Film does not meet the standards set in WP:NOTFILM. Jim Heaphy (talk) 04:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.