Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trowers & Hamlins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Kept, nomination withdrawn following improvements in sourcing. Non-admin closure. AllynJ (talk | contribs) 17:54, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Trowers & Hamlins

 * – (View AfD)

Law firm whose only claim to notability is unsourced and has been for some time. Randomshoes 13:09, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Invoking the dreaded "Keep, I've heard of it" argument here, but (while this is an appalling article) T&H is a bona fide major player in the market with a lot of press coverage (416 hits on Google news, albeit some are press releases of theirs); tons of coverage in reliable sources including plenty using phrases such as "preeminent" and "leading". The Middle Eastern arm is also apparently the oldest law firm in Oman —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  13:26, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added a couple of references, and my google search suggests that there should be more. This and this, for example, help substantiate their claims. --Moonriddengirl 13:35, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - Could use better sourcing to buttress notability claims. /Blaxthos 13:39, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Yes it's a lousy article, but the work by Moonriddengirl (thankyou!) shows it is notable and that the information is verifiable. No issues that can't be resolved via copyediting. Pedro | Chat  13:58, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm happy to withdraw the nomination with respect to the changes on the page - well done that user! Still could do with a bit more work.  In short, keep. --Randomshoes 16:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.