Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troy Conrad Therrien


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  02:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Troy Conrad Therrien

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:ARCHITECT and WP:NPROF. Ploni (talk) 18:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Architecture,  and Museums and libraries. Ploni (talk) 18:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Canada and New York.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary).
 * --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete The article fails to meet the subject notability guidelines mentioned above. It also fails the WP:GNG, with three primary sources, one non-sigcov source, and an article in which the subject is mentioned twice, none of which count towards the GNG. Finally, the article is written a little too much like a resume. Toadspike (talk) 03:14, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Head of a curatorial department at the Guggenheim is definitely something that could lead to notability, either through WP:GNG or WP:PROF, but we don't have evidence that it has in this case. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:16, 25 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.