Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troy Sympson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:32, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Troy Sympson
I tagged this as "potential vanity" a couple of weeks ago, the author removed the tag, somebody else has twice prodded it and both times the prod was removed. So as deletion would be contested I have brought the article here. There is nothing notable in the article and fails WP:BIO my vote is delete.--Richhoncho 12:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC) I know of Mr. Sympson. He is pretty popular in the Cleveland arts and journalism communities. Hope this helps! From: Karen Reed —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.39.107.126 (talk • contribs).
 * Delete per nom (unless he uses his 'uncanny ability' to influence me to change my vote). Images need deleting too. - Yomangani 12:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BIO and appears to be WP:VAIN. --Porqin 12:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Whpq 13:29, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above plus fails WP:V. KarenAnn 13:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above comments. Subject fails WP:BIO, WP:V, and is clearly WP:VAIN. Scorpiondollprincess 14:46, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not naotable, has WP:VANITY written all over it. Mr Stephen 15:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I have heard of him, I live in Cleveland and I believe he is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.238.114.5 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete; barring wikipedia I find 74 google results, while not being difinitive certainly satisfies me as to a lack of notability. —   pd_THOR  undefined | 16:26, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I know this man. My company is looking to hire him for writing services. I feel this page is useful. 63.238.114.5 18:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC)John Black
 * — The preceding discussion comment was the only subject contribution by 63.238.114.5 (talk • contribs).
 * Delete clear example of WP:VANITY.--Sam Harmon 18:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:BIO, reeks of WP:VANITY, unable to WP:V, and "usefulness" is not a criterion for keeping. -- Kinu t /c  19:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom Mattisse 21:55, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.