Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trr

Trr
An article about a thread on a bulletin board. - TB 11:36, Oct 1, 2004 (UTC)


 * This needs voting for?? Why can't tripe like this be speedily deleted. delete. Wyllium 11:38, 2004 Oct 1 (UTC)
 * A question to be pursued on Wikipedia talk:Candidates for speedy deletion if you're seriously asking. The article is (as far as I can tell) factually accurate but in my opinion falls below the (very low) threshold of usefulness for inclusion in Wikipedia.  Other's opinions may differ, hence the 5 day voting period. - TB 12:03, Oct 1, 2004 (UTC)
 * Yet another candidate for the managed deletion, IMHO also irrelevant enough to be 'deleted. But as long as that one isn't finalized it has its five days of fame. andy 12:11, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Some people really do have too much time on their hands. Delete. -- Necrothesp 13:11, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Did someone honestly think this was significant? Delete. Average Earthman 14:41, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Nonsense. Delete --Jll 16:15, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable forum thread.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 17:47, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete.. If this is art, then my dog is a talented artist who creates sidewalk installations every morning. --Ianb 18:36, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. YANNIS (Yet Another Non-Notable Internet Site). [[User:Livajo|&#21147;&#20255;|&#1090;]] 03:09, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Oh the humanity! Utterly non-notable. --Improv 16:39, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * trr owns you.
 * I pwn trr! I mean: non-notable, possible BJAODN candidate. Delete.