Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trua


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Captive orcas.  MBisanz  talk 04:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Trua

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

lacks notability, reliable 3rd party sources. Appears to include original research. Rtphokie (talk) 13:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Delete. No refs, not notable. Duplicates content at Captive orcas Aymatth2 (talk) 18:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Not a notable animal Lets  drink Tea 01:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect, it is a plausible search term and redirecting would point people to the actual content we have and stop people from creating the separate article over and over again. - Mgm|(talk) 09:49, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Captive orcas, which is where this Orca's parents' info is held. --Ged UK (talk) 10:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.