Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truck balls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Weird. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 22:15, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Truck balls
Article lacks any useful content, is probably mistitled and is of doubtful value. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 21:11, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Google search for "Bulls Balls" returns nearly 42,000 hits, and a similar one for "Truck Nuts" gets 52,300. They've even been mentioned in several newspaper articles. The article could use a clean up, and a couple more sources, but it's definitely notable. tmopkisn tlka 23:49, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Dumb but fairly notable. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:53, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Seems to have multiple independent coverage, Keep per WP:BALLS WP:CORP. Kappa
 * Keep As notable reference. - Should also cross-reference to Bulls Balls and possibly Bumper Nuts. Article describes a new phenomenon that has also become a popular phrase throughout the world. Multiple companies provide the product under similar names. 'Truck Balls' is the most general and wide-spread label for this item, as is 'Truck Nuts'.  Article should become more generic with synonymous labels/brands listed.  References to web sites should be complete only to show the varieties, popularity and to reference usage examples.  Example of comparisons, though obviously biased but factual, could be source for some information. Article needs significant rewording to maintain definition orientation instead of specifics of one vendor.  --Jrbeaman 04:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Deltabeignet 07:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Stupid but verifiable. Verifiably stupid? JChap (talk • contribs) 00:59, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.