Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trud, Zemlia i More


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  09:42, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Trud, Zemlia i More

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A newspaper published by a political party for only two months before election. Fails WP:NORG  D Big X ray ᗙ  06:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  D Big X ray ᗙ  06:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  D Big X ray ᗙ  06:33, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  D Big X ray ᗙ  06:34, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - first of all, notability isn't temporary. The wording 'for only two months before election' shows a lack of understanding of the context that Russia was engulfed in during the revolution. Secondly, the source Getzler source confirms its contemporary notability. One cannot expect that a publication that preceded google (especially over 100 years ago) would have a lot of google hits, as if had existed today. --Soman (talk) 20:51, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note - Vote is from creator of the article. Accesscrawl (talk) 03:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - I have to agree that the wording 'by a political party for only two months before election' and is troubling, as if its short-lived period and political connections made it non-notable. Sources on historic publications such as this are academic in nature, and the article clearly shows it has been studied and referenced by scholars in the Russian and English languages relating to early Soviet politics. Just a few others to have included studies of the paper in their works are V. V. Petrash's Моряки Балтийского флота в борьбе за победу Октября, N. M. Yakupov's Борьба за армию в 1917 году, and A. Yu. Dvornichenko's Российская государственность: история и современность. Spokoyni (talk) 22:36, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If the paper in its short lifetime of 2 months did something extraordinary that passes WP:ORGCRIT and merits an article of its own then It must be easy to show. I don't see that extraordinary coverage. passing mentions or dependent coverage while discussing another main topic, don't count. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  07:44, 4 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep passes WP:GNG. I'm not sure WP:NORG is intended to apply to a century-old Russian newspaper, but I'd wager it also passes that as well. SportingFlyer  T · C  12:20, 5 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.