Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Britt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

True Britt

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article about the Autobiography of Britt Ekland, while she herself is clearly notable - her autobiography fails BOOKCRIT. Claim of being "best selling" is not held up. Contents of the article has no commentary on the book (sales figures, reviews etc) and just has a few quotes, with subjective inferences. Current sources are the book itself and a broken link to blogspot. Only reviews I could find were on GoodReads and such (NYT review about different book - happens to mention title in headline - that took me a while to figure out). The book may or may not be a valuable source for the Britt Ekland article, but doesn't warrant an article of its own. -- D'n'B-t -- 13:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Women. -- D'n'B-t -- 13:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - a page entirely lacking in independent and reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 20:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Britt Ekland: It was verifiable that the book is on existence. I would say the best option is to redirect to the author since it's always with WP:PRESERVE and ATD. Yes! There is a problem of SIGCOV and WP:NBOOK, but that shouldn't be a "wake up call" to deletion. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 11:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:36, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: Likewise the nominator, the author is a notable writer or in related field, and so, her book should be a redirect prior to what we see happens in such cases on Wikipedia. There could be in the future detailed reference to the book. So, redirecting to the main author is the 'perfect' way to justify this deletion discussion. Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 08:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't understand this. Geschichte (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. The book was mentioned in the media, but mainly by conveying gossip, so the reliability and significance is questionable. For the same reason, I don't think it should be redirected. Geschichte (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.