Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Influence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was revert to set index. Similar situations have occurred in the past. Each instance reported has resulted in the article being reverted to the previous state. (non-admin closure) —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 05:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

True Influence

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Self-promotion; fails WP:NCORP.

Page history seems to show that the an editor wrote the True Influence article in their sandbox, then avoided the AFC process by choosing a little-used disambiguation page (Spindel), overwriting the contents of it with what they had in the sandbox, moving Spindel to True Influence, and redirecting Spindel to someone with the surname. This flies in the face of several proper procedures. Madg2011 (talk) 22:54, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:55, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:56, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Should we just restore the disambiguation page and delete the new redirect? Cthomas3 (talk) 03:28, 19 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Also to discuss Cthomas3's suggestion

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  06:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.