Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True statement

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:07, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

True statement
Created by user DotSix (violating his ArbCom injunction). Looks like original research and/or a POV fork of Truth. --cesarb 21:10, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not valuable Groeck 21:17, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete dicdef (and a pretty self-evident one at that). --TheMidnighters 22:19, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Jachin 22:37, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with above. Amren (talk) 23:51, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per TheMidnighters ManoaChild 00:20, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV (only presents one theory of truth) and unencyclopedic Banno 20:39, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --Nate Ladd 21:07, August 31, 2005 (UTC) Is there some reason why this cannot be marked for Speedy Delete? I would think it would qualify since it was created in violation of an Arb Comm injunction.
 * conceivably, under criterion five, Criteria for speedy deletion; but not until DotSix is banned: Wikipedia:List of banned users. Banno 21:25, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.