Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trueman Bradley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Black Kite (talk) 09:50, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Trueman Bradley

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Subject not notable enough for its own article. I Never  Cry  20:38, 10 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Move and/or Redirect It's an actual book--that is verifiable. There are some reviews; probably enough to meet the significant coverage requirement either for an article about the book or the author, but not the character.  Perhaps move to Trueman Bradley - Aspie Detective or Alexei Maxim Russell and redirect.--William Thweatt TalkContribs 20:48, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GNG. The sources in the article demonstrate significant coverage in multiple reliable sources independent of the subject. This article would be a good place to list all of the Trueman Bradley books. The alternative is an article for each book in the series (assuming it becomes one). Pburka (talk) 01:58, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Refs#1 and 5 are dead links. Refs# 2 and 3 are about the novel not the character. Ref# 4 is about Debbie Patterson and only mentions Trueman Bradley in 2 short paragraphs. Ref# 6 is also about the novel and not the character. The novel might meet WP:GNG, but not the character. I  Never  Cry  20:26, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * This has devolved into a debate about what the article should be named. Whether it's Trueman Bradley or Trueman Bradley - Aspie Detective or Alexei Maxim Russell isn't particularly important to me. Pburka (talk) 23:12, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 11:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 11:57, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 20:57, 17 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets WP:GNG. AuthorAuthor (talk) 11:19, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per GNG. Cavarrone (talk) 09:39, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.