Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trumaker & Co.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:25, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Trumaker & Co.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am not seeing coverage rising to the level of WP:ORGCRIT here. BD2412 T 17:42, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep WP:SIGCOV in Fast Company, TechCrunch, and Bloomberg, all of which are WP:RS, means it passes GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:43, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:03, 27 March 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Further discussion of the mentioned sources is needed

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MrClog (talk) 14:36, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: The provided references are a mix of start-up proposition descriptions, overviews of this and other start-ups in the sector, and funding announcements. This is a firm going about its business, but my searches are not finding the level of coverage required to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 08:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion or yellow pages. References reflect the company's PR and Communications department. The Fast Company reference is based on information provided by the company and an interview with company execs, fails WP:ORGIND. The Muse reference is the same - journalist is invited to the "office" and writes an article pumping the company, fails WP:ORGIND. None of the TechCrunch reference are anything more than paid articles expounding the wonderfulness of the company, none are significant and none contain Independent Content, fail WP:ORGIND. Topic fails WP:NCORP/GNG.  HighKing++ 17:56, 12 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.