Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump 2024: The World After Trump


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, WP:SNOW and WP:NOTADVERT. Article can be restored if notability is clearly established beyond publications giving it notice due to promotional efforts. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Trump 2024: The World After Trump

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am deeply unsure how notable this is. It seems to all be about pre-release promotion, even though the film is supposed to have been released. No reviews or post-release press. Slatersteven (talk) 12:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

And lots of asking for people to sponsor screenings, so I am not sure its has in fact been released other then as a YouTube video.Slatersteven (talk) 13:05, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

We do not have an official release date, just a month. Most films are released on a given day.Slatersteven (talk) 13:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 13:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 13:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 13:16, 16 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Looks self-promotion of a campaign stunt. Two "news" outlets cited, Washington Times and the deceptively titled CBN news which seems to be Christian Broadcasting Network "at the forefront of the culture wars since the network’s inception in the early 1960s", so both appear to be unreliable sources. Third party sourcing needed. . . dave souza, talk 14:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete or Merge into Paul Crouch Jr.. Non-notable conspiracy theory video. Note that it will most likely become more than just a YouTube video. Crouch is perfectly capable of ordering a run of DVDs and selling them online and in Christian bookstores, of buying time on religious cable channels, and of arranging screenings at fundamentalist churches. All standard marketing for videos of this nature, and not in any way an indication of notability. Basic principle: if you can buy it, it isn't evidence of notability. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:20, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete – I've not found many actual reliable sources covering the film, so it currently fails WP:NFSOURCES. As it's not been released, it does not meet any of the five WP:NFO criteria — even if it were released, I doubt it would meet the criteria still. Seems rather self-promotional as mentioned by Dave souza (it's almost as if there's an election around the corner!). —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 14:26, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. The notability bar is pretty far from being met, and we're not here to provide free publicity. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 15:46, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SOAP. Let them advertise it in other locations. If it becomes notable, then we'll have an article. jps (talk) 17:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Donaldd23 (talk) 19:04, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SOAP. Nika2020 (talk) 22:01, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge per Guy. I have added some sources, but coverage still seems pretty flimsy considering the film was just released. Grayfell (talk) 00:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.