Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump Divorce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deleted CSD#G5 having been created by a block-evading sock. Not that it would have survived anyway. Black Kite (talk) 17:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Trump Divorce

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The content of this article was removed from the BLP of Dave Aronberg. The editor made no attempt to engage in meaningful discussion about this and created the article as a way around it. This article isn't about the topic of the so-called 'Trump divorce' at all. It centers completely on the marital situation of one couple. Even if the topic of the 'Trump divorce' is actually notable, this is a case of Blow it up and start over. The entire premise of the current article claims that the term 'Trump divorce' is solely applied to this couple. WP:NEO may also apply. WP:NOTNEWS most likely applies.Niteshift36 (talk) 00:58, 20 May 2018 (UTC) Niteshift36 (talk) 00:58, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:06, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:06, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:06, 20 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Contentfork. cinco deL3X1 ◊distænt write◊  01:36, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per Entry. Reb1981 (talk) 02:34, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete The divorce of a notable person can be covered briefly in that person's biography. The article title is misleading and inappropriate. Wikipedia is not not a tabloid, and we do not give tabloid clickbait titles to articles. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  04:34, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * delete- clearly no notability per above, and it's just one event which can be covered in the POTUS page if needed provided sources are given or else is clear BLP violation. not news, not tabloid. unless if fox news is willing to run 2 in depth coverage then we can then accept this. not CNN. Quek157 (talk) 08:24, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NOTTABLOID....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:44, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom but wouldn't a redirect to Dave Aronberg prevent the article from being recreated? – TheGridExe  ( talk )  20:10, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It would not prevent it from being recreated. Niteshift36 (talk) 22:15, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
 * we can page protect the redirect but seriously do this redirect even need to exist?Quek157 (talk) 09:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Literal WP:WHOCARES, along with WP:REFSPAM, we're not the Miami New Times or Deco Drive. Dave Aronberg is also packed with too much fluff for a county DA article and needs a serious pare-down.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:14, 21 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.