Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump Pizza Hut commercial


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Donald Trump filmography. Consensus is against keeping, and the redirect isn't contested.  Sandstein  13:58, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Trump Pizza Hut commercial

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Insufficiently notable piece of media. It's mentioned in Donald Trump filmography, which seems sufficient for the topic.  pluma  ♫ '''♯ 07:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I'm seeing a lot of vague references to sources and notability guidelines, but nobody's actually provided a strong source analysis. The sole keep !voter noted that there were some newspaper articles from back in the day but did not provide links, while others did not discuss the sources present in any detailed way. Additional discussion regarding the sources both in the article and the print sources contemporaneous with the advertisement being run will be helpful in establishing consesus around notability. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mhawk10 (talk) 05:23, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.   pluma  ♫ '''♯ 07:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely non-notable ad. No redirect.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 06:20, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Donald Trump filmography I agree that it's not notable enough to have an article, but I don't see a reason not to redirect it. We have information about it in another article, we'd might as well target it there to aid anyone who might look it up. Mlb96 (talk) 08:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is sourced good enough to easily meet the WP:GNG. There is more information that can be added. Also, a separate article makes the information way easier to find to someone Googling the subject. It can be linked from the Donald Trump filmography article. It generated quite some controversy back in the day, I found some old newspaper articles that discuss the commercial more in-depth. Deleting it seems (reversed) WP:RECENTISM to me, as it got ongoing coverage years later. Per WP:IGNORINGATD, it should definitely not deleted. PhotographyEdits (talk) 17:10, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Donald Trump filmography I agree, it is referenced, well but I don't think it meets WP:GNG. Its just trump in an advert. Deathlibrarian (talk) 22:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Very, very few commercials are notable enough to have their own article, this is not even close to being one of them. Just because the actor appearing it was notable at the time and went on to become much more notable does not make it in any way something that needs to have a separate article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:12, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:IGNORINGATD. There is a perfectly fine merge target if the article cannot be kept, so deletion should certainly be avoided here. PhotographyEdits (talk) 14:25, 18 December 2021 (UTC)


 * @Mhawk10 Sorry, I will try adding those sources very soon. PhotographyEdits (talk) 14:26, 18 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.