Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trunten


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  00:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Trunten
This is an unheard of fan-fic character from a series that doesn't even exist. Why speedy was declined the first go-round is a wonder, though I 'spect it has to do with the deciding admin erring and believing the character legitimate (and thinking the write-up was to blame). Papacha 03:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is definetely made up, if anything it should be part of the article discussing the made up fiction, that is also a fabrication. Popcorn2008 03:30, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Popcorn2008
 * Strong Delete the definition of fancruft. Danny Lilithborne 03:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- TheFarix (Talk) 03:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Call it for what it really is, a hoax. --TheFarix (Talk) 03:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: But of course!... 'cept WP:HOAX doesn't let me vent (with gusto~!!). I thought the opening verbage covered it, but yeah, a link would have been nice. Papacha 04:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete fancrufty crap junk. — Natha  n  ( talk ) / 04:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete character in nonexistent anime series. --Metropolitan90 05:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I suspect speedy was declined on the first go-around not because the deciding admin thought the character was legit, but because you don't know the difference between nonsense and patent nonsense. Patent (obvious) nonsense has a very specific meaning. Morgan Wick 09:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Ahhhhhhhhhh... okey-doke. Not the first time someone's called me a fool in so many words, but good to know. Papacha 17:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete fanfic character or hoax. Don't know, don't care to know.  Either way, it should go. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a candidate for speedy, but certainly should be deleted here. Kafziel 13:30, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Once upon a time, people went outside to play.  Fanfic nonsense and self-abuse.  Geogre 13:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as yet another example of WP:NOT a place to dump your fanfic. -- Kinu t /c  19:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Dionyseus 02:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per fanfiction and non-canon arguments. --Rhwawn talk to Rhwawn 02:07, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: You also may want to check into this and this. --Ryajinor 17:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: can those even be public domain? They look like they incorporate elements of heavily trademarked characters, and at best could be fair use. --Rhwawn (talk to Rhwawn) 23:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.