Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TrustMe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.-- Kubigula (talk) 18:33, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

TrustMe

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Speedy request was declined due to under construction notice, but there is nothing here to indicate any notability. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 22:00, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. A non-notable company with all self-referential, self-serving references, no reliable sources.  I also see more and more often people using the "under construction" tag to stave off deletion for obviously unsuitable and speediable articles.  Accounting4Taste: talk 22:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think I came across this when patrolling, but, again, left it due to the 'under construction' notice. Possible COI too- created by a user named Andrewtrust, and this is their only contribution. J Milburn (talk) 22:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Dougie WII (talk) 03:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete AndrewTrust talk There is a live person editing this page. It was created to share information on PKNS technology, which is an alternative to traditional PKI technology used by providers like PGP and Entrust.  This entry has existed for all of 12 hours.  I don't see how you can expect people to create meaningful and technically accurate entries if you schedule them for deletion moments after they've been created.  I am a novie Wikipedia user and it takes me more than a few moments to decipher how non-XHTML wikipedia templates function.  This entry has worth, is not just a vehicle of self promotion and has valid scientific merit, as you would see if you would let me work on it long enough to take it out of under construction mode.
 * Delete per nom and WP:COI. Bearian (talk) 18:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.