Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trustbox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:24, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Trustbox

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously a Prod with rationale "Previously deleted on English Wikipedia as Trustbox (service) and multiple times on Danish Wikipedia. The visible references are poor; no evidence that this product has attained notability. Fails WP:PRODUCT, WP:GNG.". The Prod was removed by the WP:SPA article author, so I am now bringing this to AfD. AllyD (talk) 09:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Reply for requested deletion: your points are 1) visible references are poor. The references are to danish newspapers - which are widely distributed and acknowledged sources of information. For more references see - https://trustbox.dk/om-os/media-omtale/ 2) no evidence that this product has attained notability - please read trustbox's website for validation of this. It clearly shows how recognized it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by N4nd3rS32Lw (talk • contribs) 09:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by N4nd3rS32Lw (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 10:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Notable and with perfectly fine references.Ramblersen (talk) 10:55, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete no claim of notability, and an Alexa ranking of "9,452,099" is a claim of non-notability. Secondary references are all in Danish, and appear to be trivial. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 17:31, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Most of the references are not WP:RS.  There's a few in Danish which I tried to evaluate; one was behind a paywall, another was (based on auto-translate) about data hijacking, not specifically about Trustbox.  I don't see anything in the article itself which makes me think this is anything other than Yet Another Cloud Storage Startup, which nothing special about it.  And, not surprisingly, the article was created by a WP:SPA.  -- RoySmith (talk) 14:34, 22 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.