Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trustfall (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Trustfall (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I was tempted to tag this for speedy A7, but the original version of the article did have a (very weak) assertion of importance. Because I felt that assertion didn't mean much, I prodded the article. However, when the prod tag disappeared, so did the assertion of importance that saved the article from speedy deletion. Regardless of the process used, Delete.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 05:11, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Can't really find useful sourcing, under this name or their current name, "No December". No suggestion of any real following. If better sourcing can be found, happy to look again. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:38, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.