Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truth and Janey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 13:32, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Truth and Janey

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable subject fails WP:MUSIC criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. The Real Libs-speak politely 08:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

keep - passes point 5, has three major label releases, which I've added the info for. Luminifer (talk) 19:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC) keep - also passes 4 because of their tour with Leslie West. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockgenre (talk • contribs) 20:09, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * You'll need to find a citation for that one. Luminifer (talk) 20:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * http://www.iowarocknroll.com/inductee-details.php?id=104 here it says here they did some dates with West.Rockgenre (talkRockgenre 20:17, 29 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Luminifer
 * Keep - passes WP:BAND (at least two records on a major label) and has won a (presumably) significant award. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Despite the erroneous claims of the three "keep" votes, this group had no major label releases. Their "significant award" was induction into this hall of fame. Piriczki (talk) 14:00, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Piriczki, no evidence of the supposed major record release, nor that the ones listed are major. That so-called hall of fame for some NN museum clearly is not significant.  Triplestop  x3  17:13, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * They did a tour with Leslie West so it passes four and it's only an opinion that the Iowan Rock and Roll hall of fame isn't significant.Rockgenre (talk)Rockgenre 17:41, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee //  have a cup  //  ark  // 01:44, 7 October 2009 (UTC) 01:44, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:04, 7 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I've added several citations just now. With articles about the band in Allmusic, The Gazette, and The Village Voice, the subject meets WP:BAND criterion #1, or the general notability guideline. Keep. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 03:43, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep article improvements by Paul Erik show they are notable. Duffbeerforme (talk) 08:14, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Paul Erik and Duffbeerforme and per WP:BAND criterion 1. Has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:24, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.