Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truth or Legends: In Your Hometown


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify and salt. Looking at the arguments below (as well as the history of the article and the discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Draft:Delete_this_page), the unusual step of moving the content to a draft and salting the article title actually appears to be the most appropriate option. This solution prevents the loss of the work done already, while also preventing recreation without review. Yunshui 雲 水 11:08, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Truth or Legends: In Your Hometown

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable show that hasn't even been released yet. Has virtually no coverage outside of hyper-local markets and even that is thin. Fails WP:NTV Praxidicae (talk) 13:43, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per television and general notability guidelines. Three local publications with little to say other than "this show is scheduled for this time and is about that" isn't enough; no prejudice against recreation after airing if it turns out to garner more widespread attention and reviews in critical sources.    SITH   (talk)   13:52, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:58, 27 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Hard Keep How about giving it some time for more sources to come out that can be added? This page has only been live for less than twelve hours, if there were no sources period (and there are thousands of pages that don't that are still in existence), then I can understand that. But this page was in draft for months so that sources can be made and sources have been made, thin or not. I don't want to have to recreate this page from scratch in seven months when it does air. If you were going to put a delete notice on it after I took it live, you should've just done it when the page was first created instead of letting me waste my time and then try taking it away. Jeremyeyork (talk) 14:48, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Because that's not how Wikipedia works. This has been explained to you and you still move-warred it to mainspace, so the only solution is to request it's deletion. Even in 7 months after it airs, it does not mean it will be notable. Praxidicae (talk) 15:32, 27 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - It is far WP:TOOSOON for this show to be considered notable. The handful of extremely local coverage is pretty much all that there is as far as secondary coverage goes.    No prejudice for recreation if it does become notable in the future, but for now, it completely fails the WP:GNG.  Rorshacma (talk) 17:00, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Draftify - which is where this was, with the condition that an admin, AfC reviewer, or NPP reviewer be the one to move it in to mainspace if and when notability criteria are satisfied. I had gone to review this earlier, and the current sourcing (and a wp:before) did not turn up enough to really solidly pass GNG. I had been on the fence, but after taking a look at the sources again, sending this back to draft would most likely be the most appropriate course of action. My one concern is the seeming advocacy of the editor who continues to promote this article, and due to that, Delete might be the way to go, and salt it so that it can only be created with the approval of an admin. Onel 5969  TT me 18:46, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Draftify and Salt. Back into the woodwork with you!! &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 18:59, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Draftify and salt is never appropriate. Salting is done to prevent recreation, drafting is done to allow recreation if the article becomes suitable. It can't be both. Smartyllama (talk) 02:17, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I'd like to prevent recreation except after a review from an admin? &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 06:12, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.