Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truthism (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 18:26, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Truthism
Current text is different from the previous version, so CSD G4 doesn't apply. "brannon benge truthism" (without quotes) returns zero google hits. Now deleted article Brannon Benge (by the same editor) says he's born in 1985. Either a hoax or a non-notable new theory. Delete. cesarb 23:10, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Probably a hoax, almost certainly nonsense. Only 8 total G-hits for "Brannon Benge", even with out the truthism part. -- Kicking222 23:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete it smells like a hoax, but regardless it is neither notable nor verifiable. IrishGuy 23:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- unverifiable, nn, probably a hoax as well: a "famous philosopher" that has zero Google hits? (Only 3 distinct hits exist, two are accidents from word lists, the other mentions a Brannon Benge solely as being a grandchild of someone who has died). -- Karada 00:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Don't delete Truthism and Brannon Benge are both real. Google is not the definitive answer to everything.  Brannon Benge isn't well known because he is on a government watch list titled "People with immense influence".  Other notable people on this list include: John Lennon, Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcom X.  Don't delete the Brannon Benge or Truthism articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EinsteinJr (talk • contribs)
 * Account created after AfD started. --cesarb 00:07, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * (comment: see 's edits, thirteen minutes later, to Dieppe Raid for more insight into the comment above) -- Karada 00:02, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * is obviously a sockpuppet of . --cesarb 00:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete because. Danny Lilithborne 01:23, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It's nonsense. I prodded at least one of its incarnations because I couldn't find anything on it. --Jamoche 03:26, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete apparent hoax, invented by {deleted article}. complete bollocks. The wording of the Hoax tag is curiously appropriate... Just zis Guy you know? 20:27, 16 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.