Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truveris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Truveris

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable and no real asertion of notability. A few refs confirms that it exists but none give it any claim for notability. Looks like a back-office type software provider. Quite big, but size doesn't count for anything on Wikipeia  Velella  Velella Talk 20:17, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: WP:NCORP requires secondary WP:reliable sources coverage. The Businesswire (in the article) seems to be one, another can be StartupGazette's Truveris Raises $3.8M in First Round of Venture Funding (though it seems to address the same event). &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per SL93. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 23:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Businesswire regurgitates press releases. Most of StartupGazette's content is the same press release. SL93 (talk) 22:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If a news source has things like "About company name" (this press release has it in 4 places), has mostly quotes from the company, is filled with promotional language, and has no author listed with only contact information for the company, it is a press release. SL93 (talk) 22:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Indeed. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 23:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another venture-backed, privately-held, healthcare information technology company that provides pharmacy bill review software as a service promoting itself on Wikipedia. Routine announcements that a firm has received capital do not even generate minimal significance; if they hadn't, no one would bother to spam on their behalf. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.