Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tryad (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Among editors who do not appear to have a conflict of interest, there is consensus that the notability requirements aren't met.  Sandstein  07:27, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Tryad
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article was already proposed for deletion twice. Redirected in 2005 (Articles for deletion/Tryad (2nd nomination)) and deleted in 2008 (Articles for deletion/Tryad (3rd nomination)). The re-creation still does not provide any sources that satisfy WP:GNG; mostly self-published sources. -- intgr [talk] 09:39, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:51, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:51, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete by all means as unfortunately there is no good coverage, not even in the least, and my searches (News, Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary) confirmed this. SwisterTwister   talk  05:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep because information from an interview has been added since the article's nomination for deletion. This interview is not self-published, as it was written by an individual unassociated with Tryad. Because of this, at least one source that satisfies WP:GNG exists. Muffins94 (talk) 20:46, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Note: User:Mffins94 is the creator of this article.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  12:09, 3 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk   13:58, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Article fails to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. One non-self published source does not satisfy WP:NMUSIC as there needs to be "multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself." Also note that WP:GNG uses the word "sources" meaning more than one is required. Googling the band returns no results that are non-trivial and the article creator . Wugapodes (talk) 06:39, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and then redirect to triad (as in the 1st AFD, as a common alternate spelling). Independent notability has not been established; sources given are blogs or affiliated with the subject. —Lowellian (reply) 00:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Added two notable news articles regarding the Tryad Apple iTunes LP release and a second interview. Avavrek (talk) 03:24, 13 July 2015 (UTC) — Avavrek (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Note There is a member of this band named Andrew Vavrek.
 * Keep (as original nominator): Three reliable sources are present now; "substantial coverage" is debatable, but the article seems fair and factual, and the project is still active, so can gain more notoriety in the future. -- intgr [talk] 10:11, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * What three sources do you consider reliable? Please clarify, because as User:Kraxler points out below, I'm not seeing even one reliable source here, much less three. —Lowellian (reply) 05:45, 18 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete contrary to the statement here above, there seem to be no reliable sources independent of the subject (please say which ones you consider RS), all sources in the article are primary, self-publiushed, or blogs, perhaps except the Ars Technica ref which has a trivial mention of Tryad, only. Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. Kraxler (talk) 16:57, 17 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.