Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsho Rolpa Hospital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 11:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Tsho Rolpa Hospital

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This patient was a declined speedy delete, but it has no sources and no apparent justification of notability. What is your diagnosis? Ecoleetage (talk) 03:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * has anyone tried first aid? Given the location, even a 50 bed hospital might be notable. Putting on a speedy 68 minutes after the article was started, and not offering specific help, seems a little bitey to an obviously very inexperienced contributor. DGG (talk) 03:55, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - A google search suggests that this one of two hospitals in the whole district of Dolakha. It also seems to be the most likely hospital that will have to triage in the case of the Tsho Rolpa glacier lake breaking through and flooding the lower valleys. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:31, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, although I hope there's more to say about this than that it exists. Stifle (talk) 11:11, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Actually, delete due to lack of sources. Stifle (talk) 08:08, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep one of two hispitals in an entire district is notable. Does need cleanup and expansion, though. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  12:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Small hospitals are not inherently notable, no matter where they are in the world. Where are the multiple independent and reliable sources with substantial coverage needed to satisfy notability? Wikipedia is not a directory. It is crystal-ball gazing to speculate that the hospital might become important if some future geologic or hydrologic accident happened. (The grade school I attended might become notable if flying monkeys landed on the roof.) Edison (talk) 19:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  16:54, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  16:54, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability not asserted. A 50 bed hospital in Central London would get the same treatment unless it was the national unit for something. JFW | T@lk  20:26, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice. I looked for sources and found none.  Wikipedia is not best served by having a one-sentence stub that basically says "A hospital exists in this place."  If/when anyone actually writes something about the hospital, then I'd be happy to have a real article written.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:53, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of sources. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 19:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.