Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsui Wah Restaurant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 06:08, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Tsui Wah Restaurant

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very promotional article on possibly non notable chain of restaurants. Text reads like a direct translation from primary and affiliated sources in original language, possible copyvio? Possibility that this may pass notability hence bringing to discussion, Mabalu (talk) 19:50, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Mabalu Mattaidepikiw   (Talk)  19:53, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 25 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep. - It's tempting to hit the delete button on this one with it's terribly promotional content and language. But being written like an advertisement isn't proper grounds for deletion if the topic is notable and the article can realistically be written into one appropriate for wikipedia. The restaurant chain has attracted enough independent commentary from reliable sourses that it appears to pass WP:GNG, but It's a terribly weak pass because of how localized all the coverage is, see Places of local interest. I hate it when people use wikipedia to promote their thing, but this seems notable enough that I vote it still be included in WP. See ORG. I'm open to good arguments against its general notability. - Metal lunchbox (talk) 04:11, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite - nuke all the offending promotional material and rewrite according to the available references, which are all independent reliable sources (including South China Morning Post). The chain itself is a listed company trading in the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and has branches in Macau and mainland China. If this is deleted as just "local interest" then I would really question Wikipedia's commitment against WP:systemic bias. _dk (talk) 08:42, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep, support rewrite/mass deletion of promo stuff. Company is a publicly listed company, which makes it definitely notable (HSI:1314). Dengero (talk) 15:02, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup - The topic has received just enough coverage (that I've found from sources available online) to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Source examples include:
 * South China Morning Post - ,
 * Macau Daily Times -
 * Summary of coverage in The Standard - (scroll down)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 13:20, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.