Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TuVox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. NawlinWiki 16:37, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

TuVox
Recently founded corporation. (Closing admin: Procedural listing. Count me as neutral.) BanyanTree 00:35, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

10-25-2006 -- I completely removed irrelevant "external links". Nezzo 00:43, 26 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete spam, NN, OR /Blaxthos 01:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. Hello32020 01:57, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I listed this for speedy deletion under CSD G11, but TruthbringerToronto's edit provides a reference. If another reference is provided (thus fulfilling the WP:CORP requirement for multiple independent media mentions) I will change to keep. VoiceOfReason 02:26, 26 October 2006 (UTC) With references, this is a keep. VoiceOfReason 16:02, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, 2001 isn't that recent, seems to have fairly good mention in references. --Steve 02:42, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added some more references from various industry-specific publications such as Speech Technology Magazine, so I think the company now passes WP:CORP. I still don't know how what the company's annual sales are because the company is privately owned. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 02:45, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep the references seem pretty solid. Djdickmutt 04:10, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as can be seen by the ghits and (recently added) refs, the company seems to be pretty notable.  Ultra-Loser  Talk / Contributions 05:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - I dont see it as spam. I mean any corporate article could be seen as spam.  It is a privatley held company but, they are recognized in some magazines (listed in the sources).  I dont see why they shouldent have an article.  Chris Kreider 13:43, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. By looking at the customers (Activision, Citibank etc. etc.), the company seems notable. Google also placed this company on top of the list, with even many things that represent the notability. There are also articles from the news about this company. Cheers -- Imo  eng  21:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * weak keep, even though the name makes it sound like a Vulcan. Grutness...wha?  23:48, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I have added three more references for TuVox (Red Herring, Call Center Magazine, The Wall Street Journal) Nezzo 23:58, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.