Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tu Reinas (Diante do Trono album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 16:53, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Tu Reinas (Diante do Trono album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Future release that currently does not meet nor does it claim to meet any notability guidelines (WP:NALBUMS). All self-published sources except the one sales source. It may be notable after it's released. See WP:TOOSOON. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:49, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  03:02, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:47, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per rationale, failed to assert the subject's notability. The Portuguese article doesn't help much, it is much bigger, but most of the sources are also self-published.  Victão Lopes  Fala! 05:24, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Mantain Each time i give a paced in the wiki i see absurds. The article is sent to the PE and the editors are not reported. Slapstick. * Maintain since criteria WP:NALBUM indicate no need for secondary sources. The second criterion is clear when he says that if the creator of the work is remarkable, so too will the work, then it is able to be maintained. But for all purposes include other sources in the article. See WP:TOOSOON. --177.138.181.149 (talk) 20:18, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, what WP:NALBUM says is "that an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article". Victão Lopes  Fala! 23:07, 1 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 08:45, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 16:10, 14 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.