Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tua-Uo-Loa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 07:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Tua-Uo-Loa

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

See Articles for deletion/Maelare for more on this. Apparently a whole bunch of Polynesian articles were created at once from a dubious website. Most were deleted, but a few are still around. I can't find any sources for this one that aren't mirrors, and it (like Maelare) may not actually exist. FCSundae ∨  ☃   (talk) 08:54, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. After 5.5 years on WP, still no references. Fails WP:V and WP:N. Nsk92 (talk) 11:29, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any references. Aleta  Sing 18:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - yet another part of the mess made with spurious articles from that dubious website (as you well describe it). Grutness...wha?  01:25, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. As there are no reliable sources cited, I am persuaded that the article does not comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 18:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 21:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 21:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.