Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuan Guru Haji Ahmad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. per WP:G5, only significant contributors were socks. The Wordsmith Talk to me 19:52, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Tuan Guru Haji Ahmad

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable per WP:GNG, likely part of the efforts of an Indonesian sock network (tho cannot confirm for now). Allan Nonymous (talk) 18:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Allan Nonymous (talk) 18:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Islam,  and Indonesia.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete There is limited substantial coverage and sourcing about him, mainly dependent on a single primary source covering him and 21 other scholars in Bengkalis regency. Nonetheless, his name has been honored as the title of a local public library, there is an article about him on the local government website, and there is an academic publication about him indicating his significance within local region. Ckfasdf (talk) 23:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep There is no indication that the nominator has done WP:BEFORE before creating a deletion page |1. He also lack the ability to understand about Indonesian subject and notability of sources used in the article as he did here in other nomination page that he created |2 |3. 202.43.93.9 (talk) 03:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * — 202.43.93.9 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Keep: This, this, this, this and the book already cited in the article should be enough for GNG. Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 12:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.