Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuangru (software company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Tuangru (software company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page clearly reads like an advert in its entirety (to the point at which a clean up would remove nearly everything) and I therefore struggle to see how it would pass WP:ORG. Vasemmistolainen (talk) 10:46, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete- Looks like an act of a sockpuppet. Tuangru was speedied under G5 criteria. I do agree with the nominator. There was an AfD earlier related to this topic Articles for deletion/Tuangru (company). I don't know why it was closed abruptly. Though the result was delete. I am pinging, the admin who closed previous AfD. Hitro   talk  11:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 13:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 13:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete not particularly notable and it appears to match the description from the AFD of the Tuangru ((company)).Randomeditor1000 (talk) 14:55, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is spam and the sources seem to come from public relations firm(s). FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 18:42, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete for strong promotional tone. Alexius08 (talk) 02:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete As per op, fails WP:SPIP. -- HighKing ++ 19:06, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.