Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tub (unit)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. North America1000 11:35, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Tub (unit)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NOTDICTIONARY -War wizard90 (talk) 02:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep This unit was a statutory measure in the UK - see Robinson, Crabb or Mortimer, for example.  Weights and measures are almanac material and so are valid content per WP:5. Andrew D. (talk) 13:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep article now that I've rewritten it with a couple of Andrew D's sources (I think Mortimer might have a typo re firkin, by the way). And I've added it to the dab page at Tub. Will also tidy up Firkin (unit) while I've got those refs to hand. Pam D  14:17, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Done so - please chip in to help. Pam  D  14:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * ANd have expanded Tub (unit) to show what a variable/ill-defined thing it was. Pam  D  15:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for working on the article Pam, I think in it's current state this is no longer a dictionary definition, so I am ok with keeping it. -War wizard90 (talk) 23:06, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep per 's expansion of history, context, and sourcing in the article. Nice work. --Mark viking (talk) 20:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.