Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tube Hunter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 03:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Tube Hunter

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable software. Main results from Google search are shareware and warez sites, no reliable third party coverage. Q T C 05:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 01:01, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article is unreferenced, and I can't find any third-party reliable coverage, Lord Spongefrog,  (Talk to me, or I'll eat your liver!)  11:28, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 01:06, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Seems to be a too-specific article to be encyclopedic. I could see an article on download managers, but this is too much; and it doesn't seem to be notable anyway.- Wolfkeeper  01:48, 27 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, 0 references and reads like a sales brochure. LoudHowie (talk) 03:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: lacked references. Alexius08 (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.