Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tucker benedict


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Tucker benedict

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Other than a single article that claims his is a public figure, I can't seem to find the level of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article required to back up that claim. The only mentions of him in reliable sources seem to involve his claims of being assaulted at a wild party that his father threw that got his father in legal trouble. Ahecht (TALK PAGE ) 17:17, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

All you have to do is be able to use a search engine other than google or correctly use google. If you use Facebooks search engine-with a much more up to date algorithm-you can see thousands of people discussing me writing. Additionally if you look up tucker h benedict on google the following is more clear.

https://www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=tucker%20benedict

also on google if you understand how to properly search using SEO tactics it comes right up

https://www.google.com/#q=tucker+benedict&start=10&* — Preceding unsigned comment added by TBenedict (talk • contribs) 17:54, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, people here do know how to use a search engine and understand search results and Tucker you just don't meet WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO at this time, sorry. Delete. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:59, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1281856965184507&id=1036841469686059&substory_index=0

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=785288988307030&id=610045389164725&substory_index=0

I'm sorry you're absolutely incorrect.
 * I do see there has been local coverage of an unfortunate instance involving Tucker, but that would not be enough to confer notability, by our standards, at this time. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

So thousands of people discussing the topic across various media platforms doesn't confer notability? You're personal feelings toward the matter are clouding your ability to read, without bias, the standards you claim to be yours. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TBenedict (talk • contribs) 18:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No, Tucker, people who may be discussing you on social media like Facebook doesn't confer notability, here. I ask you again to read the notability guidelines and understand what we mean here by a WP:Reliable source. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:27, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd specifically direct you to sections like WP:USERGENERATED and WP:SELFSOURCE as well as of course WP:COI. Editors are strongly discouraged when it comes to creating articles about themselves. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

You need to take your "job" on wikipedia a little less seriously. When media coverages catches up to millennial trends in a few months there's going to be a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TBenedict (talk • contribs) 20:06, 1 March 2017 (UTC) PAGE''' ]]) 20:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If if happens in a few months, then that's fine. Wikipedia is supposed to be a lagging indicator of notability, and intentionally waits for the media to "catch up". There's no rush. --Ahecht ([[User_talk:Ahecht|'''TALK
 * And see WP:CRYSTAL. If that ever does happen, someone other than you should create the article about you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG. The COI doesn't help assure me that there's anything else to make this notable. South Nashua (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete indeed, if something besides Facebook followers appears to notice, then maybe in the future the guidelines will be met. Until then, see Too soon. W Nowicki (talk) 21:41, 2 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.