Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuctuc Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Zoozaz1  talk 18:14, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Tuctuc Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is the page for a short-lived commercial project. It definitely existed, but I can't find sufficient coverage to meet WP:NORG. As an alternative to deletion, the page could conceivably be redirected to Transport in Brighton and Hove, which already exists as a discrete paragraph about the business. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:06, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 19:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Roller26 (talk) 19:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep. Sure, the sources I found are not that great, but in additional to local coverage in Brighton, I do find some more than routine coverage of the company in reputable outlets in the UK: 1, 2, 3 etc. There is also news reporting on the company in India where rickshaws were imported from: 4, and case study of the company: 5. Taken all of this together, while the sourcing isn't that great and the article must definitely be improved if kept, I am convinced this company is more than a mere run-of-the-mill entity and barely passes the WP:NCORP threshold. Dps04 (talk) 11:06, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — &thinsp;J947 ‡ message ⁓ edits 21:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment There is a paragraph in Collis (2011), The New Encyclopaedia of Brighton. I will make some edits to the article now and see where it goes from there.  Hassocks 5489 (Floreat Hova!)  20:29, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I've now expanded the article as far as possible with available sources (diff). If "Delete" is the outcome, please could this be transferred into my userspace (into a sandbox or whatever) so I can look for more sources; I have a feeling there may be more out there.  Hassocks 5489 (Floreat Hova!)  22:35, 30 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep - the article was in a parlous state when nominated, now thanks to Dps04 and Hassocks5489 it's looking MUCH better. Mujinga (talk) 09:34, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.