Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tudor Adventure


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 11:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Tudor Adventure

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Games seems to fail notability. A search on the three main game sites of IGN, GameSpot and allgame returns nothing. A google search finds this which doesnt appear to provide evidence of notability and it also isnt listed at Amazon. Salavat (talk) 04:34, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Salavat (talk) 04:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course you wouldn't find anything on IGN, GameSpot or allgame. They don't cover educational games. -- Sabre (talk) 09:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - unless this has received coverage in teaching / educational magazines, I don't see how this self-published software will meet the notability guidelines. Marasmusine (talk) 11:05, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. As with Medieval Adventure, this makes no assertion of notability. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 14:32, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.