Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tudor IT Process Assessment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  14:55, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Tudor IT Process Assessment

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. Sources are primary or do not mention TIPA. Spam. Widefox ; talk 08:53, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 25 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete As an unimportant and obsolete-from-the-day-it-was-spawned process methodology. Yet another one with too much big government procurement involved in it and decades behind the curve of real IT management. It's make-work for dull people in cheap suits. Also delete because it's Luxembourg, and if it's not US or UK, en:WP sees it as inherently insignificant.
 * OTOH, I see no policy-based reason to delete this. There's plenty of sourcing out there, especially if you read French IT procurement policy documents. Martin Fowler protect us. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:37, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, S warm   we ♥ our hive  07:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk   13:29, 7 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.