Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tufa Shujineng


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. I see a consensus to Keep this article. If you wish to pursue a Merge with another article, you can take that on by starting with a discussion on the article talk page and the talk page of the target article. Liz Read! Talk! 20:33, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Tufa Shujineng

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

All existing sources are offline which can't prove notability as I have found nothing literary in Google Books search. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, History, Asia,  and China. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep and merge to Tufa Shujineng's Rebellion as target page The article needs a lot of work but contemporary sources exist. Simonm223 (talk) 15:46, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Please demonstrate with WP:THREE. Google Books sources provide nothing to support it's existence. !Vote is not vote if you can't demonstrate the notability. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Gladly. One, two, three, four, five. Simonm223 (talk) 15:53, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * there is also this doctoral thesis - and I know that PhD level theses are a debated point within our discussion of academic RSes but it still contributes toward this being a minor notable figure. Simonm223 (talk) 15:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * there are also 14 references to the figure in Google Scholar if you use the simplified Chinese spelling rather than the pingyin. Simonm223 (talk) 16:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * When you propose Merge, how can you !vote as Keep? Contradictory? Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm saying we should Keep this one and merge the other into it. I'm sorry if I was unclear with my intention. Simonm223 (talk) 16:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep per the sources found. I’m neutral on the proposed merger. Mccapra (talk) 16:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment - those who are in Keep !vote, please have a look at this and if that doesn't comply then it's a shame. Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:15, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but I don't follow your reasoning here. I think all the keep !votes are aware he's included in the classic of Chinese literature Sanguoyanyi. He's also included in several classical histories including the Sanguozhi. He's also mentioned in the academic sources I outlined above. Your google search algorithm is not cause for deletion. Simonm223 (talk) 16:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per source found and a historical figure. He was a chieftain of Hexi Corridor, an important region of ancient China, so passes WP:NPOL as chieftain is a ruler. 1.47.208.177 (talk) 05:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.