Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuff Tonneaus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Insufficient reliable and independent sources are available to demonstrate notability ~ mazca  talk 00:13, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Tuff Tonneaus

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability, no refs, and reads like an Ad. Making parts for certain notable car makers doesn't make you notable IMO. Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 22:17, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:COMPANY, since as far I can tell it hasn't "been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." I'm not sure if I agree with the nominator that it reads like an ad, but I will agree that no notability has been asserted. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 20:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. While Tuff Tonneaus generates an impressive 856,000 Google hits, nearly all of what I am seeing is advertising/product purchasing type pages, as opposed to "reliable, independent" sources as cited by WP:COMPANY. As such, I'm not convinced it qualifies for notability.   Cocytus   [»talk«]  01:24, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.