Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tugger: The Jeep 4x4 Who Wanted to Fly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  08:29, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Tugger: The Jeep 4x4 Who Wanted to Fly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability. Two reviews in local publications, if that is the scale of available refs, is an argument for lack of notability. TheLongTone (talk) 15:02, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 15:21, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 19:27, 6 January 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:26, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * KEEP WP:AUD is 1) only for organisations, 2) a guideline, 3) completely illogical garbage that should be deleted since, according to what it says, coverage in the media of Andorra is "national" and therefore good but coverage in the London media may be "local" and therefore insufficient. The relevant standard is WP:NFILM which two reviews meets, regardless of whether they are "local" (whatever this means) or not. I also see no sign here that the nom has done WP:BEFORE and I'm inclined to think they haven't because of the bit about "if that is the scale of the refs". FOARP (talk) 17:04, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, I guess. Given the cast, there's surprisingly little media attention. But the small American sources, combined with this capsule review in the South African media, are probably sufficient to clear the bar. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 19:43, 13 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.