Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuhin Sinha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sources put forth in the keep have been countered, and having survived since 2008 is not a reason to keep. Star  Mississippi  02:34, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Tuhin Sinha

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The refs are all either book reviews (mostly brief ones at that) or subject's own articles and interviews. Since he's a spokesperson of a major party, there are a lot of search hits but the coverage is limited to quotes only. Journal hits are a different person. Note that he was a columnist for Times of India, so ToI refs need additional scrutiny. Hemantha (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Hemantha (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hemantha (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Television.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per nom. What to apply? WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NPOL? The entity fails in both. Possibly WP:TOOSOON case. -Hatchens (talk) 12:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   11:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * KEEP as the article has survived since 2008. There are enough citations to support the article. -- NeverTry4Me  - TT Page 04:04, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to have plenty of coverage, especially for #3 of WP:NAUTHOR ("multiple independent periodical articles or reviews" of a work or collection of work). Here are some of his books that have articles and/or reviews:
 * Of Love and Politics - The Hindu review, "A mix of politics and love" - The New Indian Express article (via ProQuest), "Tuhin's 'Of Love & Politics' an insight into India's pol history" - United News of India review (via ProQuest), "A stuttering tale of love" - DNA review (via ProQuest)
 * Edge of Desire - The Hindu review, News 18 review, "Women empowerment, focus of Tuhin Sinha's 'Edge of Desire'" - United News of India article (via ProQuest)
 * When the Chief Fell in Love - "Tuhin Sinha's new book aims to add new perspective to Kashmir issue" - United News of India article (via ProQuest), "'When the Chief Fell in Love', to release tomorrow" - Indo Asian News Service article (via ProQuest), IWM Buzz article
 * India Fights the Dragon - Republic World review
 * The Legend of Birsa Munda - Entertainment Times review
 * Daddy - "The New-age Father" - The New Indian Express (via ProQuest)
 * Otherwise, there are also sources that seem suitable for GNG:
 * "Bestseller author Tuhin Sinha becomes new Mumbai BJP spokesman" - Business Standard
 * "Loyola alumnus comes up with fifth thriller - The Edge of Power focuses on crime against women, will hit stores on Christmas-eve" - The Telegraph (India)
 * "Writer's corner: Of love, politics and grist for the literary mill" - DNA (via ProQuest)
 * "Loyola lad's second take on love" - The Telegraph (India) (via ProQuest)
 * "Old boy sets bar for youth" - The Telegraph (India) (via ProQuest)
 * "Turning Pages on Road Safety" - The Telegraph (India) (via ProQuest - Whisperjanes (talk) 06:08, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * That's a long list of hits from ProQuest search. Have you looked through them? Some of your links are so blatantly inappropriate that I'm not sure if this wasn't WP:REFBOMBing. Still, let's go through.
 * On sources you claim cover NAUTHOR #3
 * IWMBuzz isn't even considered reliable for Indian films, their main coverage area.
 * Republic is a deprecated source.
 * This ToI review literally has "micro-review" in its head. It can't possibly be WP:SIGCOV. Note also that WP:NFSOURCES (while not applicable directly) has wording that specifically bars these "capsule reviews".
 * All the UNI (a wire agency) reports are credited to the same author. The article on When the chief fell in love is clearly not a review. The one on Of Love & Politics uses identical words (Aditya Samar Singh aristocratic, Brajesh Ranjan overtly nationalistic agenda) as TNIE and is mostly made up of dialogs copied from the book instead of any significant independent content. The one on Edge of Desire uses same lines from the book's blurb. Neither appears to have been carried by any WP:RS. Combined with UNI's unknown reliability, there is enough to doubt the independence of these articles.
 * Beyond Of Love and Politics (which itself can be argued with, but I haven't looked in detail), none of these books could be considered significant enough for Wikipedia. The current state, where none of those books have articles on them, reflects it.


 * On the sources you claim suitable for GNG -
 * Business Standard is actually from IANS, a newswire, but also carried by other newswires like ANI. Without a by-line or a credit, this routine announcement is indistinguishable from a press release.
 * The three Telegraph pieces are all book launch announcements, by the same author who has reused the same general structure and even identical bio blurbs (Before penning books, Tuhin also used to write screenplays for Hindi daily soaps. ... Finishing school in 1995, Tuhin then went on to pursue graduation in commerce from Hindu College, Delhi. He also holds a diploma from National Institute of Advertising.) since his first book release in 2008. The rest of those articles are made up of author quotes and they are basically interviews. The extreme similarity of the article on "Have a Safe Journey" launch to other articles covering it (similar lines on author lists, road safety awareness, Minister's foreword, CEO's message - all in that same order), brings into question the independence of these articles.
 * The remaining Telegraph article actually covers a speech he made and is full of quotes from that speech. It has nothing at all about him apart from Sinha, who is a novelist, a BJP spokesperson in Mumbai and an advisor to the ministry Hemantha (talk) 06:30, 13 March 2022 (UTC)


 * KEEP. Certainly passes WG:GNG, also there are SIGCOV. The article needed to clean up. UphillAthlete (talk) 10:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.