Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuhina Das


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Vanamonde (Talk) 10:59, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Tuhina Das

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This one might prove difficult but I shall explain, after noticing it had been flagged for notability concerns by, I performed a google search and what I discovered was that she had indeed won an award, but a non notable one that even implied WP:TOOSOON, furthermore the actor and model fail to meet WP:NACTOR as they haven’t featured in significant roles in multiple movies. Furthermore a before search also notes Times of India mentions her but the TOI is noted for its less than ethical practices and is no longer considered a reliable source. Celestina007 (talk) 22:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

STRONG KEEP. English sources are not the only ones that decide notability. --Peripatetic (talk) 00:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * @, let’s start by you are the creator of this article so I understand the sentiment, in any case I have done an evaluation of the non English sources you provided below as you can see, Furthermore big font sizes do not change nor influence the outcome of an AFD. Celestina007 (talk) 18:12, 21 July 2021 (UTC)


 * https://www.anandabazar.com/entertainment/exclusive-interview-of-actor-tuhina-das-dgtl-1.1171880
 * https://bengali.news18.com/news/entertainment/interview-of-bengali-movie-actress-tuhina-das-am-394039.html
 * https://zeenews.india.com/bengali/tags/%E0%A6%A4%E0%A7%81%E0%A6%B9%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%BE-%E0%A6%A6%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%B8.html
 * https://www.magzter.com/stories/Celebrity/ANANDALOK/1580295534
 * https://www.rtvonline.com/entertainment/137349/%E0%A6%AC%E0%A6%B0%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%A3%E0%A6%AC%E0%A7%88%E0%A6%B7%E0%A6%AE%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%AF%E0%A6%B0-%E0%A6%AC%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%B0%E0%A7%81%E0%A6%A6%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%A7%E0%A7%87-%E0%A6%A4%E0%A7%81%E0%A6%B9%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%BE-%E0%A6%A6%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%B8


 * Keep - Certainly looks like a keep to me, per WP:GNG. Looks like sustained ongoing coverage in both English and non-English sources. On the English side, while the Times of India isn't reliable for historical or political stuff, I think they're fine as far as tabloids go, and there's plenty of recent coverage from them. Celestina007, what non-English sources did you look at during WP:BEFORE? Suriname0 (talk) 17:30, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * @, when a source is deprecated there is no event or special circumstance wherein it becomes reliable. Celestina007 (talk) 18:15, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Unless there's a recent decision I'm unaware of and WP:TOI hasn't been updated yet, Times of India is not a deprecated source. Apologies if a missed a newer discussion! Suriname0 (talk) 19:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment — below is an evaluation of the “sources”, provided above and the “piece” they optimized, all have been evaluated and still fall below the threshold of WP:GNG. Celestina007 (talk) 18:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment — Above is an evaluation of the “sources”, provided above and the “piece” they optimized, all have been evaluated and still fall below the threshold of WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR is not satisfied at all or in any manner as the article’s subject is yet to feature in significant multiple roles and have not won a prestigious award reserved for actors. Celestina007 (talk) 18:10, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - there are non-TOI sources related to her lead role in the notable 2019 film Gharey Bairey Aaj, e.g. Indian Express, The Statesman, FirstPost, and in this 2021 interview with The Telegraph, she discusses playing Damayanti in the Damayanti and Nokol Heere web series, as well as the 'primary character' Mithila in the film Brown, but I have not found strong sources to show these are notable productions, per WP:NACTOR (I found a Zee News interview with her about Damayanti, a Telegraph interview with the director of Damayanti and Nokol Heere, and a Telegraph interview with the director of Brown), but she is also featured in a July 21, 2021 bylined TOI article about an upcoming film where she has a lead role, and her anti-racism advocacy was also covered by ABPlive in 2021 - as with the RTV article titled "বর্ণবৈষম্যর বিরুদ্ধে তুহিনা দাস" ("Tuhina Das against racism"), both of these sources offer WP:SECONDARY synthesis of facts surrounding her statement, so they appear to support WP:BASIC notability, and help tip my !vote towards a weak keep when combined with other sources, even though her acting career appears to need some, but perhaps not much time, to fully meet the WP:NACTOR criteria. Beccaynr (talk) 20:21, 21 July 2021 (UTC) In addition to the upcoming film Aparajita, per TOI noted above, the trailer for Abhijaan was released in March 2021, and she has a 'crucial role,' per The Telegraph; according to The Indian Express, "A galaxy of acclaimed actors from Bengali film industry are in the cast." Beccaynr (talk) 20:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:10, 28 July 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete or Draftify: A case of WP:TOOSOON. While Beccaynr makes a good case that the subject could be notable in future, it does not meet the notability standards as of now. The non-trivial content provided by the above two articles is too less to keep under BASIC. May be draftified until there are significnt roles in multiple notable productions to meet NACTOR. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:39, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Nom and Ab207. Although it may be WP:toosoon Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. -- Otr500 (talk) 18:47, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 14:21, 4 August 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist. Celestina007's source analysis is persuasive, but Baccaynr's sources have not been examined in detail.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 17:15, 11 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.